you can’t kill your ancestors….or else

So a few weeks ago I had started reading Steven Pinker’s book ‘The Better Angels of our Nature‘ praising it for being well written unlike other writers.

So of course it was inevitable that the book then started getting a bit boring and long, so much so that I’ve decided to abandon it about half way through. (I still think that it might be a good book but that I’ve a short attention span.)

I guess also that I was reading looking to pick holes.
I wanted to be able to talk about things with my brother in law for example or to just try and understand things from a different point of view.

Maybe the hole I would pick if I was picking a hole is  that I don’t really understand how from a purely evolutionary point of view  someone like Steven Pinker would think that violence is necessarily a nasty thing or something we should turn our noses up at. The back cover says that this

‘myth-destroying new book reveals how contrary to popular belief, humankind has become progressively less violent, over millennia and decades’

Well that’s great news if it’s true, but if it’s all a cosmic chemical reaction is there anything ‘wrong’ with all that violence that went on all those years ago and that we’re apparently leaving behind?
You can write books appalled at how awful we were to each other in the violent old days, but hey, it worked. You’re writing books because your ancestors acted violently and proved themselves stronger and more suitable gene vehicles for the conditions than others at the time. They had traits that meant they were more adapted to conditions, the made it through to the next round.

I’m not really sure what I’m trying to say. Something like the whole book doesn’t make sense. My nephew came out with a line to his mum a few months back, something like

You can’t kill your ancestors or else you wouldn’t exist..’ 

If you’re reading this and natural selection by cold chemical reactions and physics is what brought about life, if  ‘our purpose’ is to be some type of gene vehicle then all that violence was  effective because it ensured that our ancestors survived and that we now exist.  In a way violence was/is beneficial as our ancestors weren’t killed or murdered.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “you can’t kill your ancestors….or else”

  1. At some stage, a very long time ago, being covered in fur and eating insects was an essential for my ancestors. That said, I’m glad to say that my genetic software seems to have upgraded itself since then. I’m not saying that we are always getting better, just that some things might have been advantageous at some point but not nessecerily nice now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s